Monday, October 16, 2017

THE PARADIGM IS FALLING

By David D. Wronski


As youโ€™ve probably heard, weโ€™re having a paradigm shift. As if that wasnโ€™t enough what with talk of a polar shift and the news reading like the worldโ€™s going you-know-where in a hand basket.  In any event, I am hopeful. Exceedingly so, in fact.

I have a new paradigm for you.  [That reminds me of Moses.  He goes up the mountain and the Lord appears and says, โ€œMoses, I have commandments for you.โ€  Moses asks, โ€œAnd how much are they?โ€  โ€œTheyโ€™re free.โ€  So Moses says, โ€œso, give me tenโ€.]  Really, I have a paradigm for you.  How much, you ask?  Howโ€™s about 20 cents?  (Get It? Paradigm, par-a-digmโ€ฆpair of dimes.)   Any New Ager worth his/her salt has probably dropped the term at least twice before lunchtime on any given day.  Usually connected to the word โ€œshiftโ€.  Even at Starbucks you'll likely hear statements like, โ€œHeโ€™s so old paradigmโ€.  โ€œDonโ€™t let the paradigm shift leave you without two dimes to rub together.โ€  โ€œBuddy, can you spare a paraโ€ฆ.?โ€ 

So now that Iโ€™m through with the chuckles, just what is this new paradigm, anyway?  As far as paradigms go, however, it seems we get only one at a time.  And itโ€™s not a commandment, like with Moses; itโ€™s the lens you see the world through.  According to one definition a paradigm is a model or pattern that an individual or group uses in trying to understand somethingโ€ฆa general agreement of belief of how the world works.

Near as I can tell the current, modern paradigm all of us were born into historically can be summed up as โ€œUS AND THEMโ€, the splitting of observer from the observed.  Or, as we read in the news,โ€ them evil-doers over there.โ€  This split way of thinking, observer and observed, comes from Rene Descartes, 1596-1650.  Heโ€™s the guy who also came up with โ€œI think, therefore I am.โ€  (And you know how whack that is.) So with all the thinking in the modern paradigm world, weโ€™ve come up with a lot of stuff. Were it not for the paradigm shift, weโ€™d continue our one sided scientific/technological spree and load up the world with so much stuff that it might just stop spinning under all the weight.  Paradigm shift or shiftless, you choose.

The trouble with the old way of seeing the world is that recently weโ€™ve come to realize that you cainโ€™t ever take the observer out of what is being observed.  As my young daughters used to say, โ€œWhen youโ€™re pointing a finger at someone else, three more are pointing back at you.โ€  Or, as they used to say in their most sassy way, โ€œWhatever you say goes back to you!โ€  So if you want to do something about what you see around you, take a look at whatโ€™s in you that is like whatโ€™s around you.  Now donโ€™t confuse the messenger with the message, but Mr. Michael Jackson said it best, โ€œTake a look at the man in the mirror.โ€  Chilton Pierce, an expert on child development said, [I paraphrase] โ€œIf you want your children to be the way you want them to be, you be the way you want them to be.โ€  And wasnโ€™t it the Dalai Lama who said that there is no world peace without inner peace.  And since Iโ€™m on a quoting roll, the words scrawled on the bathroom wall in my army barracks so long ago:  โ€œFighting for peace, is like fโ€ฆing for virginity.โ€    

If you see that the so-called modern paradigm isnโ€™t all itโ€™s cracked up to be or that thereโ€™s got to be a better way, then you may be ready for a paradigm shift.  So the new thinking would be stated as this: โ€œWEโ€.  What Iโ€™m talking about here is โ€œWEโ€ as in โ€œall Godโ€™s chillunโ€.  And thereโ€™s more.  Itโ€™s all of us as an integral part of the community, the ecology, the world, the universe; not separate from it or each other.  This ainโ€™t some pixie dust, sentimentalism.  Who said, โ€œNobody ever had a problem out of an experience of unityโ€?  Read the Tao of Physics and other books by Fritjof Capra for a full discussion of this immensely interesting topic.

And, you may wonder, how does this relate to my favorite topic, my life career interest, Dr. Ida P. Rolf Method โ€” Structural Integration?  My work has to do with integrating (not separating) the individual human beingโ€™s energy field into the energy field of the earth. Deep ecology; can you dig it?  For a glimpse at the upper reaches of what is possible here, imagine a line anchored to the center of the earth and extending out to cosmic infinity.  Now center yourself on that line.  Or in more practical terms:  10 happy toes in front of two dancing feet. 

Can you feel the paradigm shifting?  Steady Freddie!  There's a train a-comin', get on board.

No comments: